| layout | article |
|---|---|
| title | UET Topic 0.24: Artificial Intelligence |
| description | AI scaling-law and sparse-architecture diagnostics in the UET framework. |
Note
AI-Digest: This topic currently supports an internal AI scaling and sparse-architecture benchmark. It checks topic-local scaling-law constants, a small GPT-style scaling table, and dense/MoE active-parameter fractions. It does not yet prove AI alignment, ethics as a physical law, consciousness, or universal intelligence dynamics.
The accepted evidence for this topic is limited to reproducible scaling-law and
sparse-architecture diagnostics. UET-specific bridges such as alpha_N ~= kappa,
entropy-based learning-rate rules, alignment equilibrium, and consciousness
models remain open until they have their own source-backed verifier artifacts.
flowchart LR
A["scaling_laws.json"] --> B["alpha_N, alpha_D, alpha_C"]
C["GPT3_Scaling_Laws.csv"] --> D["log-log alpha fit"]
B --> E["scaling benchmark artifact"]
D --> E
F["deepseek_moe_data.json"] --> G["active_fraction and capacity ratio"]
G --> E
H["kappa_macro proxy"] --> I["alpha-kappa bridge check"]
B --> I
I --> E
E --> J["Claim Class C boundary"]
K["alignment / ethics / consciousness scripts"] --> L["future lanes only"]
| Layer | Current status | Evidence / artifact | Claim allowed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scaling-law constants | Source-referenced working copy | Data/03_Research/scaling_laws.json |
benchmark input |
| Local exponent fit | Runnable diagnostic | Research_AI_Scaling_Audit.py |
internal consistency check |
| MoE sparsity | Runnable diagnostic | deepseek_moe_data.json, verifier artifact |
active-parameter comparison |
alpha_N to UET kappa bridge |
Heuristic/open | artifact blocker when mismatch is too large | no constant-identification claim |
| Entropy-learning engine | Implemented but not benchmark-validated | UET_AI_Core.py, FORMULA_AUDIT.md |
future optimizer benchmark |
| Alignment/ethics/consciousness | Exploratory | limitations and future scripts | no physical-law claim |
| Pillar | Purpose |
|---|---|
Doc/ |
analysis notes for AI entropy, ethics, and alignment concepts |
Ref/ |
referenced AI scaling, neural network, and transformer materials |
Data/ |
topic-local scaling-law and architecture metadata working copies |
Code/ |
engine, proof, research, competitor, and developmental-AI scripts |
Result/ |
verifier artifacts, plots, and run logs |
cd C:\Users\santa\Desktop\uet_harness
python docs/topics/0.24_Artificial_Intelligence/Code/03_Research/Research_AI_Scaling_Audit.pyFORMULA_AUDIT.md: reviewed formula/variable/unit/proof-status registry.VERIFICATION_SPEC.md: primary command, metrics, thresholds, and artifact contract.DATA_MANIFEST.md: data provenance, unit conventions, hashes, and benchmark roles.METHOD.md: method scope, evidence lanes, variables, and dependency policy.LIMITATIONS.md: blockers that prevent stronger AI/alignment claims.
- Scaling and model metadata are local working copies, not a complete archival upstream provenance package.
- The
kappabridge is heuristic and must not be promoted as a derived law. - MoE sparsity is not equivalent to full efficiency, intelligence, safety, or alignment.
- Ethics, alignment, consciousness, and developmental-AI claims remain future lanes until separately verified.