Add no_std support#32
Open
TTWNO wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Owner
|
Hey, thanks for opening that PR! I am relatively busy lately so I might take a bit of time to take a look and answer your PR (the other PR dates back from 1+ month which is completely horrendous...), even though it doesn't look that complicated. Thanks for taking the time to participate in this project. I'll answer ASAP. |
|
I'm not in particular hurry since I was planning to see if I could change from a loop into an iterator |
Author
|
@Ballasi just checking in. No rush, I just had to use my git version of the project again for a |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi there,
I'm working on a project to get an extremely minimal TTS working in Rust.
As part of the requirements, my library needs to be
#![no_std].It'd be nice to take advantage of existing libraries; and yours is very easily adapted to
no_std.This makes that simple change.
The only two future consideration are:
stdwill need to be behind a feature flag, andstd_instead_of_alloc; this will suggest that any imports fromstd::be changed toalloc::where possible.Thanks for putting in the hard work for this!