Skip to content

Update module gopkg.in/DataDog/dd-trace-go.v1 to v1.74.8#52894

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/gopkg.in-datadog-dd-trace-go.v1-1.x
Open

Update module gopkg.in/DataDog/dd-trace-go.v1 to v1.74.8#52894
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/gopkg.in-datadog-dd-trace-go.v1-1.x

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Jun 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
gopkg.in/DataDog/dd-trace-go.v1 v1.73.1v1.74.8 age adoption passing confidence

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.


Release Notes

DataDog/dd-trace-go (gopkg.in/DataDog/dd-trace-go.v1)

v1.74.8

Compare Source

v1.74.7

Compare Source

[!NOTE]
This is the last minor release for v1. The Go tracer v1 transitional version is a wrapper that preserves the API from v1 but uses v2 under the hood.

[!WARNING]
This release has been retracted due to problematic upgrades to the minimum Go version. Please use the latest v1.74.x version instead.

This transitional version is the only v1 version that allows both v1 and v2 to be imported in the same service—enabling you to migrate a service gradually. Using this v1 transitional version doesn’t require any code changes, but it also won’t support any new features introduced in the new v2 tracer.

Changes

Updates github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-go/v2 from v2.2.3 to v2.3.0

Full Changelog: DataDog/dd-trace-go@v1.74.6...v1.74.7

v1.74.6

Compare Source

What's Changed

This patch release fixes a significant bug that caused dropped spans due to local sampling rules overriding the sampling decision already present in inbound distributed trace context.

[!IMPORTANT]
Depending on your sampling rules, and especially if you have trace sampling rules,, you may notice an increase in ingested spans. This increase is expected and the consequence of not applying trace sampling rules when there is a head sampling decision. If the ingested volume is problematic, reduce it using APM Ingestion Controls. For any questions or issues, please contact Datadog Support.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM)

Full Changelog: DataDog/dd-trace-go@v1.74.5...v1.74.6

v1.74.5

Compare Source

[!NOTE]
This is the last minor release for v1. The Go tracer v1 transitional version is a wrapper that preserves the API from v1 but uses v2 under the hood.

This transitional version is the only v1 version that allows both v1 and v2 to be imported in the same service—enabling you to migrate a service gradually. Using this v1 transitional version doesn’t require any code changes, but it also won’t support any new features introduced in the new v2 tracer.

Changes

Updates github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-go/v2 from v2.1.0 to v2.2.2

Full Changelog: DataDog/dd-trace-go@v1.74.3...v1.74.5

v1.74.4

Compare Source

[!WARNING]
This release has been retracted due to incorrect dd-trace-go/v2 version, use the latest v1.74.x available instead.

[!NOTE]
This is the last minor release for v1. The Go tracer v1 transitional version is a wrapper that preserves the API from v1 but uses v2 under the hood.

This transitional version is the only v1 version that allows both v1 and v2 to be imported in the same service—enabling you to migrate a service gradually. Using this v1 transitional version doesn’t require any code changes, but it also won’t support any new features introduced in the new v2 tracer.

Changes

Updates github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-go/v2 from v2.1.0 to v2.2.2

Full Changelog: DataDog/dd-trace-go@v1.74.3...v1.74.4

v1.74.3

Compare Source

[!NOTE]
This is the last minor release for v1. The Go tracer v1 transitional version is a wrapper that preserves the API from v1 but uses v2 under the hood.

This transitional version is the only v1 version that allows both v1 and v2 to be imported in the same service—enabling you to migrate a service gradually. Using this v1 transitional version doesn’t require any code changes, but it also won’t support any new features introduced in the new v2 tracer.

Changes

Updates github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-go/v2 from v2.0.1 to v2.1.0

Full Changelog: DataDog/dd-trace-go@v1.74.2...v1.74.3

v1.74.2: : v1 transitional version

Compare Source

[!NOTE]
This is the last minor release for v1. The Go tracer v1 transitional version is a wrapper that preserves the API from v1 but uses v2 under the hood.

[!WARNING]
The v1.62.0 - 1.74.0 go tracer releases included debug logs that sometimes include sensitive data. This patch resolves this behavior.

This transitional version is the only v1 version that allows both v1 and v2 to be imported in the same service—enabling you to migrate a service gradually. Using this v1 transitional version doesn’t require any code changes, but it also won’t support any new features introduced in the new v2 tracer.

Changes

Removes dependencies updates from go.mod files mistakenly added when releasing v1.74.1

Full Changelog: DataDog/dd-trace-go@v1.74.0...v1.74.2

v1.74.1: : v1 transitional version

Compare Source

[!WARNING]
This release has been retracted, use the latest v1.74.x available instead.

[!NOTE]
This is the last minor release for v1. The Go tracer v1 transitional version is a wrapper that preserves the API from v1 but uses v2 under the hood.

This transitional version is the only v1 version that allows both v1 and v2 to be imported in the same service—enabling you to migrate a service gradually. Using this v1 transitional version doesn’t require any code changes, but it also won’t support any new features introduced in the new v2 tracer.

Changes

Updates github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-go/v2 from v2.0.0 to v2.0.1

Full Changelog: DataDog/dd-trace-go@v1.74.0...v1.74.1

v1.74.0: : v1 transitional version

Compare Source

[!WARNING]
This release has been retracted, use the latest v1.74.x available instead.

[!NOTE]
This is the last minor release for v1. The Go tracer v1 transitional version is a wrapper that preserves the API from v1 but uses v2 under the hood.

This transitional version is the only v1 version that allows both v1 and v2 to be imported in the same service—enabling you to migrate a service gradually. Using this v1 transitional version doesn’t require any code changes, but it also won’t support any new features introduced in the new v2 tracer.

Note that, while we are offering the v1 transitional version for the convenience of our customers, we strongly encourage you to upgrade to the v2 version as soon as possible to benefit from the newest features and improvements. If you have concerns or reasons to not upgrade to the transitional version, contact us and we’ll work together to resolve them.

v1.73.2

Compare Source

What's Changed

[!NOTE]
This is a patch release of the last v1 version before the v1 transitional release v1.74.0 planned for May/June 2025. The Go tracer v1 transitional version is essentially a wrapper that preserves the API from v1 but uses v2 under the hood.

The transitional version can co-exist with v2 in the same service, which enables you to migrate services gradually. Using the v1 transitional version - starting at v1.74.0 - doesn’t require any code changes, but it also won’t support any new features of the new v2 tracer.

The v1 transitional version is planned for release in late May/early June 2025 as v1.74.0.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM)

Full Changelog: DataDog/dd-trace-go@v1.73.1...v1.73.2


Configuration

📅 Schedule: (in timezone Europe/Paris)

  • Branch creation
    • At 12:00 AM through 04:59 AM and 10:00 PM through 11:59 PM, Monday through Friday (* 0-4,22-23 * * 1-5)
    • Only on Sunday and Saturday (* * * * 0,6)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate Bot added changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed dependencies PRs that bump a dependency dependencies-go PRs that bump a go dependency qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation labels Jun 27, 2026
@renovate

renovate Bot commented Jun 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

ℹ️ Artifact update notice

File name: pkg/dyninst/testprogs/progs/go.mod

In order to perform the update(s) described in the table above, Renovate ran the go get command, which resulted in the following additional change(s):

  • 6 additional dependencies were updated
  • The go directive was updated for compatibility reasons

Details:

Package Change
go 1.23.1 -> 1.24.0
github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-go/contrib/net/http/v2 v2.2.3 -> v2.3.0
github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-go/v2 v2.2.3 -> v2.3.0
github.com/go-viper/mapstructure/v2 v2.3.0 -> v2.4.0
github.com/hashicorp/go-secure-stdlib/parseutil v0.1.7 -> v0.2.0
github.com/hashicorp/go-sockaddr v1.0.2 -> v1.0.7
golang.org/x/exp v0.0.0-20250408133849-7e4ce0ab07d0 -> v0.0.0-20250606033433-dcc06ee1d476

@dd-prapprover-prod-77c48c

dd-prapprover-prod-77c48c Bot commented Jun 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PRApprover will approve and merge this PR, FAQ, #dx-source-code-management

🛠️ PRApproval Status

  • ✅ PR is eligible for auto-approval by rule datadog-agent-renovate - 2026-06-27T06:21:17Z
  • ⬜ CI tests passed
  • ⬜ Approved
  • Manual merge required: this rule does not auto-merge.

➡️ Current phase: CI tests failed. Please fix the failing tests to continue.

@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts Bot added the internal Identify a non-fork PR label Jun 27, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly label Jun 27, 2026

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 0c64378bda

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

module github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/dyninst/testprogs/progs

go 1.23.1
go 1.24.0

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Keep testprog module compatible with Go 1.23 builds

This module is still regenerated by dda inv system-probe.build-dyninst-test-programs for go1.23.11 and the generated Ninja rule pins GOTOOLCHAIN to that version (tasks/system_probe.py:1883 and tasks/system_probe.py:1936). Raising the module directive to go 1.24.0 makes every Go 1.23.x invocation fail before listing or building packages with go.mod requires go >= 1.24.0, so the dyninst Go 1.23 test binaries can no longer be regenerated unless the module stays 1.23-compatible or the Go 1.23 target is removed/updated.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@datadog-prod-us1-4

datadog-prod-us1-4 Bot commented Jun 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
Patch Coverage: 100.00%
Overall Coverage: 51.19% (+0.10%)

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 0c64378 | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!

@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Jun 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Files inventory check summary

File checks results against ancestor 6c9376ee:

Results for datadog-agent_7.82.0~devel.git.425.0c64378.pipeline.121423988-1_amd64.deb:

No change detected

@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Jun 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Static quality checks

✅ Please find below the results from static quality gates
Comparison made with ancestor 6c9376e
📊 Static Quality Gates Dashboard
🔗 SQG Job

32 successful checks with minimal change (< 2 KiB)
Quality gate Current Size
agent_deb_amd64 747.919 MiB
agent_deb_amd64_fips 703.865 MiB
agent_heroku_amd64 308.716 MiB
agent_rpm_amd64 747.903 MiB
agent_rpm_amd64_fips 703.848 MiB
agent_rpm_arm64 723.471 MiB
agent_rpm_arm64_fips 683.024 MiB
agent_suse_amd64 747.903 MiB
agent_suse_amd64_fips 703.848 MiB
agent_suse_arm64 723.471 MiB
agent_suse_arm64_fips 683.024 MiB
docker_agent_amd64 806.741 MiB
docker_agent_arm64 807.326 MiB
docker_agent_jmx_amd64 997.638 MiB
docker_agent_jmx_arm64 986.875 MiB
docker_cluster_agent_amd64 208.163 MiB
docker_cluster_agent_arm64 221.378 MiB
docker_cws_instrumentation_amd64 7.447 MiB
docker_cws_instrumentation_arm64 6.877 MiB
docker_dogstatsd_amd64 39.032 MiB
docker_dogstatsd_arm64 37.180 MiB
docker_host_profiler_amd64 305.309 MiB
docker_host_profiler_arm64 316.409 MiB
dogstatsd_deb_amd64 29.763 MiB
dogstatsd_deb_arm64 27.822 MiB
dogstatsd_rpm_amd64 29.763 MiB
dogstatsd_suse_amd64 29.763 MiB
iot_agent_deb_amd64 45.695 MiB
iot_agent_deb_arm64 42.414 MiB
iot_agent_deb_armhf 43.199 MiB
iot_agent_rpm_amd64 45.696 MiB
iot_agent_suse_amd64 45.695 MiB

@cit-pr-commenter-54b7da

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: 07d95adc-1285-4cf0-9f80-cba85f5811e3

Baseline: 6ea230e
Comparison: 0c64378
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory utilization +1.11 [+0.86, +1.36] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_idle memory utilization +0.51 [+0.45, +0.58] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization -0.15 [-0.19, -0.11] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load memory utilization -0.19 [-0.23, -0.15] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_no_fs_load memory utilization -0.23 [-0.32, -0.14] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory utilization -0.50 [-0.56, -0.43] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization -0.97 [-2.04, +0.10] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed observed_value links
quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 3 ≤ 4 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 147.55MiB ≤ 154MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle total_bytes_received 10/10 580.18KiB ≤ 819.20KiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 3 ≤ 4 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 486.25MiB ≤ 495MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features total_bytes_received 10/10 0.89MiB ≤ 1.25MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10 4 ≤ 6 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10 183.14MiB ≤ 195MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs total_bytes_received 10/10 264.18MiB ≤ 292MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs cpu_usage 10/10 355.42 ≤ 2000 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs intake_connections 10/10 3 ≤ 6 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory_usage 10/10 400.96MiB ≤ 430MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs total_bytes_received 10/10 0.86GiB ≤ 1.04GiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_idle cpu_usage 10/10 29.52 ≤ 40 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_idle memory_usage 10/10 300.91MiB ≤ 330MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load cpu_usage 10/10 60.02 ≤ 80 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load memory_usage 10/10 271.97MiB ≤ 310MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_no_fs_load cpu_usage 10/10 23.19 ≤ 40 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_no_fs_load memory_usage 10/10 277.62MiB ≤ 320MiB bounds checks dashboard

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

Replicate Execution Details

We run multiple replicates for each experiment/variant. However, we allow replicates to be automatically retried if there are any failures, up to 8 times, at which point the replicate is marked dead and we are unable to run analysis for the entire experiment. We call each of these attempts at running replicates a replicate execution. This section lists all replicate executions that failed due to the target crashing or being oom killed.

Note: In the below tables we bucket failures by experiment, variant, and failure type. For each of these buckets we list out the replicate indexes that failed with an annotation signifying how many times said replicate failed with the given failure mode. In the below example the baseline variant of the experiment named experiment_with_failures had two replicates that failed by oom kills. Replicate 0, which failed 8 executions, and replicate 1 which failed 6 executions, all with the same failure mode.

Experiment Variant Replicates Failure Logs Debug Dashboard
experiment_with_failures baseline 0 (x8) 1 (x6) Oom killed Debug Dashboard

The debug dashboard links will take you to a debugging dashboard specifically designed to investigate replicate execution failures.

❌ Retried Profiling Replicate Execution Failures (ddprof)

Note: Profiling replicas may still be executing. See the debug dashboard for up to date status.

Experiment Variant Replicates Failure Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_idle baseline 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_idle comparison 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features baseline 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features comparison 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_logs baseline 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_logs comparison 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs baseline 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs comparison 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_security_idle baseline 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_security_idle comparison 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_security_no_fs_load baseline 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_security_no_fs_load comparison 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_no_fs_load, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_no_fs_load, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_idle, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed dependencies PRs that bump a dependency dependencies-go PRs that bump a go dependency internal Identify a non-fork PR qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants