Skip to content

Codex/paperzilla reference#49

Open
pors wants to merge 2 commits into
Orchestra-Research:mainfrom
pors:codex/paperzilla-reference
Open

Codex/paperzilla reference#49
pors wants to merge 2 commits into
Orchestra-Research:mainfrom
pors:codex/paperzilla-reference

Conversation

@pors

@pors pors commented Apr 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Conversational literature monitoring and paper chat for scientific research. Paperzilla currently supports project-based feeds from arXiv, bioRxiv, medRxiv, and ChemRxiv, plus scholar alerts; can fetch paper markdown for summarization and relevance assessment; and will soon add PubMed support.

@zechenzhangAGI zechenzhangAGI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @pors. Paperzilla looks like a legitimately useful literature-monitoring tool, but I can't merge this as written for a few reasons:

  1. Placement & weight. It adds a link to the top of the README, right under the mission/architecture section — that's prominent editorial real estate for an external product.
  2. Affiliation + commercial. As I understand it you're the founder of Paperzilla (a paid SaaS). This repo's contribution guidelines steer away from self-promotion and from foregrounding proprietary/paid products, so a top-of-README placement isn't a fit.
  3. It's not a skill contribution — there's no SKILL.md or category folder, so it bypasses the normal structure.

I'm not opposed to pointing readers at good external tools. An acceptable version would: move it into a dedicated "Related / Community Resources" section lower in the README, trim to a neutral one-liner, drop the ClawHub link, and add a brief affiliation disclosure. If you're up for that revision I'll take another look; otherwise I'll close this out. Appreciate the interest in the project.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants