Skip to content

Peter-Kahl/Authority-without-Authorship-Delegation-Thresholds-in-Agentic-AI-Systems

Repository files navigation

Authority without Authorship: Delegation Thresholds in Agentic AI Systems

by Peter Kahl, 2026-02-08

Generic badge Generic badge

Abstract

Contemporary debates about “agentic AI” are frequently framed around questions of metaphysical agency, moral status, or authorship. This article argues that such framings mislocate the central governance problem posed by contemporary AI systems. Artificial systems need not possess intention, consciousness, or authorship in order to exercise authority over others’ practical and epistemic environments. What matters instead are the structural conditions under which authority emerges through delegation. The article advances a threshold account of authority without authorship and introduces the Delegation Threshold: governance-relevant authority emerges when discretionary power becomes infrastructurally embedded under conditions of temporal persistence and non-exit such that affected parties must organise their practical reasoning around system outputs. AI systems acquire this form of authority when four conditions converge in practice—delegated discretionary power, temporal persistence, infrastructural embedding within socio-technical systems, and non-exit by affected parties. Under these conditions, systems structure action, justification, and constraint in ways characteristic of authority, even while lacking authorship of evaluative standards. Responsibility and legitimacy therefore attach not to agency in a strong sense, but to the design and maintenance of delegation structures. Drawing on decision theory, infrastructure studies, and fiduciary theory, the article explains why existing AI governance frameworks—often premised on episodic oversight, reversibility, and downstream accountability—struggle under conditions of persistence, speed, and infrastructural integration. It concludes that authority without authorship constitutes a distinct and under-theorised challenge for philosophy of technology.

Preprint Status

The manuscript is currently under review at a peer-reviewed journal. The version posted here is intended to make the argument publicly accessible during the review process and may differ from any final published version. Please cite this version if referring to the argument. Substantive revisions may be made in response to peer review.

Keywords

authority without authorship; agentic ai; delegation; socio-technical systems; infrastructure; responsibility; legitimacy; philosophy of technology

Download

Cite this work

Publisher & Licence

Version v1 published in London by Peter Kahl, 2026-01-31.
Version v2 published by Peter Kahl, 2026-02-08.

© 2026 Peter Kahl. The author asserts the moral right to be identified as the author of this work and to object to its derogatory treatment. Licensed under Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes with attribution and without modification.
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ .

About

This article reframes debates on agentic AI by arguing that authority can arise without authorship. It develops a threshold account showing how delegation, persistence, infrastructural embedding, and non-exit generate governance-relevant authority even in non-agent systems, with implications for responsibility and legitimacy.

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

 
 
 

Contributors