Skip to content

@better-auth/scim: Account/provider takeover via missing owner binding on non-org SCIM providers

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published May 31, 2026 in better-auth/better-auth • Updated Jul 7, 2026

Package

npm @better-auth/scim (npm)

Affected versions

>= 1.5.0, < 1.7.0-beta.4

Patched versions

1.7.0-beta.4

Description

Am I affected?

Users are affected if all of these hold:

  • They install and register the @better-auth/scim plugin (plugins: [scim()]).
  • They create SCIM providers without an organizationId, that is, non-organization ("personal") providers. Organization-scoped providers are not affected because they enforce organization membership and role.
  • Their application's deployment has more than one authenticated user, so one account can target another user's provider.
  • They have not set providerOwnership: { enabled: true }.

The SCIM management endpoints first shipped in 1.5.0, so every stable release from 1.5.0 onward is affected, and the stable line is not patched. On the pre-release line, builds through 1.7.0-beta.3 are affected, and 1.7.0-beta.4 carries the fix.

Fix:

  1. Upgrade to @better-auth/scim@1.7.0-beta.4 (then 1.7.0). This is a breaking change: it removes the providerOwnership option, makes owner binding mandatory, and adds a permanent scimProvider.userId column.
  2. Run the schema migration after upgrading (npx auth migrate). Connections created before the upgrade carry no owner and become unreachable through the management endpoints, so reclaim them at the database level.
  3. The 1.6.x stable line is not patched. If developers stay on it, apply the workaround below.

Summary

@better-auth/scim does not bind non-organization SCIM providers to their creator in the default configuration. Any authenticated user can manage another user's non-org provider, including reading its metadata, listing connections, regenerating its SCIM bearer token, and deleting the connection. Regenerating the token rotates it: the legitimate token stops working and the attacker holds a valid one.

Details

The plugin tracks provider ownership through an opt-in providerOwnership option and a scimProvider.userId column. Both default to off. When ownership is disabled, a non-org provider row is created without a userId, and the management access check denies access only when a stored owner id is present and differs from the caller:

// non-organization branch of the access check
} else if (provider.userId && provider.userId !== userId) {
  throw new APIError("FORBIDDEN", { message: "You must be the owner to access this provider" });
}

Because the default row has no userId, the condition is false and the request is allowed. The same gap reaches every management operation: token generation and regeneration, single-provider read, the connection list (which returns providers where p.userId === userId || !p.userId), and provider deletion.

The most sensitive operation is token regeneration. If Alice creates a non-org provider corp-idp, Bob can call the same generate-token endpoint with providerId: "corp-idp". The existing row passes the ownerless access check, so the plugin deletes it, creates a fresh row, and returns a new SCIM bearer token to Bob. Alice's previous token is now invalid, and Bob's token authenticates against that provider's SCIM API routes.

This requires no organization membership and no elevated role. It is reachable in the default scim() configuration whenever non-organization providers are used.

Proof of concept

Two authenticated users, Alice and Bob, in a default scim() setup:

  1. Alice signs in and creates a non-org provider: POST /scim/generate-token with { "providerId": "corp-idp" }.
  2. Bob signs in and reads Alice's provider: GET /scim/get-provider-connection?providerId=corp-idp returns 200 with { "providerId": "corp-idp" }.
  3. Bob regenerates the token: POST /scim/generate-token with { "providerId": "corp-idp" } returns 201 and a new scimToken.
  4. Alice's old token is rejected at GET /scim/v2/Users (401); Bob's regenerated token is accepted (200).

The behavior is reproducible through Better Auth's public API surface with two distinct sessions.

Patches

Fixed in @better-auth/scim@1.7.0-beta.4 (then 1.7.0). The fix makes owner binding mandatory: generateSCIMToken records the creator's userId on every personal connection, and the management endpoints grant access only to that owner. Organization-scoped connections keep their existing membership and role checks. The 1.6.x stable line is not patched.

This release is breaking. It removes the providerOwnership option, owner binding can no longer be disabled, and the scimProvider.userId column becomes a permanent part of the schema, so run npx auth migrate after upgrading. Connections created before the upgrade carry no owner and fail closed; reclaim them by deleting scimProvider rows that have neither organizationId nor userId, or by setting userId to the intended owner, then regenerating tokens.

Workarounds

Until a patched version is available:

  • Set providerOwnership: { enabled: true } when registering the plugin, then run the schema update so the scimProvider.userId column exists (npx auth generate or npx auth migrate). New non-org providers are then owner-bound and non-owners are denied. Providers created before enabling ownership stay ownerless until recreated.
  • Or scope every SCIM provider to an organization by always passing organizationId. Organization providers enforce membership and role and are not exposed.
  • Or restrict access to the SCIM management endpoints at the edge while non-org providers remain ownerless.

Impact

Any authenticated user can take over non-organization SCIM providers created by other users when the plugin runs with its default ownership configuration. An attacker can discover non-org provider connections, read provider metadata, regenerate another user's SCIM token (invalidating the legitimate one), authenticate to the SCIM API routes with the new token, manage SCIM-provisioned users subject to the enabled SCIM functionality, and delete the provider connection.

Credit

Reported by Jvr2022 through a private GitHub Security Advisory.

Resources

References

@gustavovalverde gustavovalverde published to better-auth/better-auth May 31, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jul 7, 2026
Reviewed Jul 7, 2026
Last updated Jul 7, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
Low

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L

EPSS score

Weaknesses

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key

The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data. Learn more on MITRE.

Missing Authorization

The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

No known CVE

GHSA ID

GHSA-j8v8-g9cx-5qf4

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.