Skip to content

`trust_remote_code` bypass via `custom_pipeline` and local custom components

High
DN6 published GHSA-98h9-4798-4q5v May 1, 2026

Package

pip diffusers (pip)

Affected versions

<0.37.1

Patched versions

0.38.0

Description

Impact

A trust_remote_code bypass in DiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained allows arbitrary remote code execution despite the user passing trust_remote_code=False (or omitting it, which is the default). The vulnerability has three variants, all sharing the same root cause — the trust_remote_code gate was implemented inside DiffusionPipeline.download() rather than at the actual dynamic-module load site, so any code path that bypassed or short-circuited download() also bypassed the security check:

  1. Cross-repo custom_pipeline. DiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained('repoA', custom_pipeline='attacker/repoB', trust_remote_code=False) — the gate evaluated against repoA's file list rather than repoB's, so repoB's pipeline.py was loaded and executed.
  2. Local snapshot + Hub custom_pipeline. DiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained('/local/snapshot', custom_pipeline='attacker/repoB', trust_remote_code=False) — the local-path branch never invoked download(), so the gate was never reached and remote code from repoB executed.
  3. Local snapshot with custom components. DiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained('/local/snapshot', trust_remote_code=False) where the snapshot contains custom component files (e.g. unet/my_unet_model.py) referenced from model_index.json — same root cause; the local path skipped download() and custom component code executed.

Silent remote code execution on the victim's machine. Anyone calling DiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained with custom pipelines is impacted.

Patches

Yes. Fixed in diffusers 0.38.0 via PR #13448. All users on versions < 0.38.0 should upgrade:

pip install --upgrade "diffusers>=0.38.0"

The fix moves the trust_remote_code gate out of DiffusionPipeline.download() and into get_cached_module_file in src/diffusers/utils/dynamic_modules_utils.py, which is the actual chokepoint for every dynamic module load (local, Hub, or community mirror). All three variants now raise ValueError instead of executing untrusted code.

Workarounds

If upgrading immediately is not possible:

  • Only call from_pretrained with pretrained_model_name_or_path, custom_pipeline, and local snapshot directories from sources you fully trust and have audited.
  • Do not pass custom_pipeline= pointing at a Hub repository different from the primary pretrained_model_name_or_path unless you have read its pipeline.py.
  • Before calling from_pretrained on a local snapshot, inspect the snapshot for unexpected *.py files, especially under component subdirectories (unet/, scheduler/, etc.) and at the snapshot root.

These are mitigations, not fixes — the only complete remediation is upgrading to 0.38.0.

References

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

CVE ID

CVE-2026-44513

Weaknesses

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')

The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment. Learn more on MITRE.

Credits